None Of The Above.
do you remember that movement for political reform? ron paul used to back it, you know, in the days before he got in bed with the whackdoodles.
he still makes sense on some things.
i haven't heard his retirement speech yet, but i heard some excerpts and he makes some good points.
anyway, the idea behind None Of The Above is that this should be a choice at elections. there are a number of proposals with different mechanics, but the general idea is that if None Of The Above wins the majority share in the election, the whole thing has to be done over with new candidates.
when i first heard about this ages ago, i remember opponents saying "you can't do that!!! it would cost too much to redo elections! it would be mayhem!"
well, not after the first time.
the first time NOTA got the majority vote those guys running the parties would finally have to sit up and take notice and provide real choices.
as long as they know they're still going to be in power, they don't have to provide real choices. they just have to mount enough theater and go through the steps.
if we make them uneasy about whether the demmicans or the republicrats will be able to retain their mutually agreed upon positions at all, they'd have to be concerned. they'd actually have to DO something.
and nobody would be able to shrug their shoulders and say the system is too entrenched for there to be change.
likewise, if the voters have NOTA as an alternative and do not use it, that will function as a mandate for business as usual. it will take away a lot of the excuses out there.
next time you see the proposal, endorse it.